![]() |
|
|
www.southgatearc.org
|
Private petition filed to restructure ham radioThey call themselves the "Communication Think Tank" and say that they are group of concerned hams. What they are worried about is the future of the hobby. And now they have beaten the ARRL in filing a proposal to restructure the service for the 21st century and beyond. Amateur Radio Newsline's David Black, KB4KCH, has read the proposal and takes a look at what it has to say: If you want to operate in voice or digital modes on amateur frequencies,
current rules require you to transmit in a selected portion of the band
you've chosen. WD8BIL: "The advancements in the modes and numbers of modes that
are now being offered for Amateurs to use pretty much dictates that the
old band structure which as served us well in the past, it is time to
change that to Bud Chiller, WD8BIL, of Sheffield Township, Ohio is one of the members of the Communications Think Tank. He says hams should be allowed to use any mode on any frequency their license class allows. In other words, current rules allowing you to use certain modes only in specific parts of a band would be scrapped. Chiller says a rules change like this would have a number of benefits for amateur radio. WD8BIL: "Under heavy - for example - phone operation right now, particularly on some of the lower bands where overcrowding in the peak hours is just horrendous it gives us the opportunity to spread out into areas of the bands that are under utilized. The second thing it does is that it give Amateur Radio a chance to self regulate when new modes come in." With today's allocation-by-mode rules, Think Tank members say potential rivals consider some amateur spectrum deserted, when in reality, other modes are active but crowded into certain sections of the bands. Chiller says making better use of amateur frequencies would thwart efforts by other services wanting to take over amateur spectrum: WD8BIL: "If the band loading were such that the entire range of frequencies within a given band are being utilized, then there is no chance for commercial interests to point a finger and say - look - there is 100 KHz that they're not even using." Preventing interference would still be up to amateurs. But Think Tank
members say ending what they call forced segregation by mode would drain
pressure away from the problem of operators making squatter's claims on
certain frequencies. That's because there would be more room and a greater
range to move elsewhere on the band. Promoters of the proposal say official
observer type programs would also assist in making sure interference problems
are minimized. And, just as is the case now, documented and Chiller says the Think Tank's proposal promotes self-governing, something
the FCC wants hams to do. Considering that current band use rules originated
50 years ago, Chiller says what the Communications Think Tank The "Communication Think Tank," or "CTT Group" that
put together the proposal is comprised of hams with a special skill in
various areas of the Amateur Radio hobby. As such they hold experience
with many hobby radio modes as well as various commercial radio licenses
beyond the amateur You can read the entire petition as filed on-line at w8er.com/prop osal1.htm after which you are invited to post your thoughts on it at the front page discussion at www.qrz.com David Black, KB4KCH - Amateur Radio Newsline
|
|
|
|
Get our news
headlines for your website - click here |
|
| |
|
| Home
| For
Sale & Wanted | Tell
a friend | Guestbook
| Cast Your Vote | Newsboard
| Amateur Radio
Forum | Links | Diary
Dates | | Games | SWLs | 'How To' Guides | Humour | Data Comms | Lottery | Amateur TV | Contests | Can You Help? | Contact Us | 10 Metres | | Clubs Worldwide | Subscribe to our Newsletter | | |
|
| |