New ARRL petition seeks to resolve BPL standoff

Not all BPL systems are created equal. Some have far less potential to interfere with Amateur Radio than others.

That's the rationale behind a petition the ARRL filed this week, asking the FCC to modify the Part 15 BPL rules it adopted a year ago and sharply reduce BPL's interference potential.

In exchange, the League said it would withdraw its still-pending Petition for Reconsideration in the BPL proceeding, ET Docket 04-37. The ARRL says its suggested rule amendments--which take into consideration recent
advancements in BPL technology--will "resolve unsettled but substantial interference issues" affecting Amateur Radio and other HF users.

"It is no longer the case that all BPL systems inherently radiate high levels of RF energy on amateur allocations on overhead medium-voltage power lines," the ARRL said. "Thus, not all BPL architectures have similar potential for harmful interference to the Amateur Radio Service (and to
other licensed services). Some have inherently greater potential for interference, as currently configured, than others."

The problematic systems, the League said, are those that make use of the HF spectrum on unshielded overhead medium-voltage lines. BPL systems such as those using DS2 or Main.net technology that lack fixed, permanent notches in
the ham bands, the ARRL noted, have been among those involved in interference cases. "As detailed in ARRL's Petition for Reconsideration in this proceeding, "this has resulted, in field tests and in deployments, in substantial, extremely difficult-to-resolve incidents of interference to
fixed and mobile Amateur Radio facilities," the League said.

The ARRL said the FCC "has assisted not at all, or imperceptibly, in these cases, and the BPL system operator has either been uncooperative or unable to resolve the interference."

The League said its proposed additional regulations would permit those BPL architectures that are "benign," while discouraging "first-generation interference-causing BPL configurations, unless the latter modify their systems in certain minor aspects." A "benign" system, the ARRL noted, would not apply HF signals on overhead medium-voltage lines and would include fixed, permanent notches in the amateur bands.

Among the several BPL system designs that implement BPL without creating harmful interference to amateur operations, the ARRL specifically cited the Motorola Powerline LV BPL system. Motorola's system doesn't use medium-voltage power lines, and it has been designed to preclude
interference to ham radio and other licensed services.

For several weeks, ARRL and Motorola have cooperated in a BPL test stand at W1AW that has operated successfully without significant interference to Amateur Radio. The League also cited BPL systems by Current Technologies,
IBEC and Corridor Systems as being among those that meet the additional requirements it's proposing.

Current Technologies' BPL deployment in the Cincinnati, Ohio, area, for example, does not make use of medium-voltage lines for transmission of HF signals and utilizes the HomePlug notching protocol. Limited testing, the ARRL said, indicates that, as a result, the interference potential "is minimal relative to Amateur Radio facilities."

Incorporating three elements into the BPL rules adopted last year would essentially resolve all issues that the ARRL and the Amateur Service have with access BPL, the League said: Prohibiting all access BPL systems from using Amateur Radio allocations (except the five channels at 5 MHz, which
the current HomePlug system architecture does not notch); prohibiting access BPL systems from using HF bands on medium-voltage power lines; and measuring signal decay from access BPL systems using a more accurate 20 dB/decade extrapolation factor rather than the 40 dB/decade factor the current rules support.

Adopting its proposals, the League said, would result in a more robust product that meets the Commission's stated goals of accommodating BPL as an additional broadband option while protecting licensed radio services.
"The present BPL rules achieve the first of the goals, but they are woefully inadequate to meet the second," the ARRL said.

"It is the Commission's obligation to recognize and utilize this opportunity and to amend its rules to protect licensed radio services for the first time in this proceeding," the ARRL concluded. "It can be done without significant system redesign by any BPL provider."

A copy of ARRL's petition is on the League's Web site.

Source: ARRL Letter - courtesy of The American Radio Relay League

Other recent stories..

Other News Stories

• Get our news headlines for your website - click here
• Submit your news story - click here