![]() |
|
|
www.southgatearc.org
|
| Over the Christmas period I found myself not feeling up to much - my
plans to build some little projects and re-arrange our garage came to
nothing due to the 'Winter Blues'. Due to the large numbers of M3 stations coming on the air I was pleased to work several of them on 7MHz and those I worked had impeccable manners. It's a real pleasure to have 7MHz so busy - just as it was 40 years or so ago when most of us used a.m. My old KW Vanguard literally lived on 40 metres and I made many friends and worked much DX using the band. The 7MHz band is absolutely ideal for communications within this group
of Islands off the northern coast of mainland Europe, and many of us tend
to think of 40 being 'our band' rather than a worldwide allocation. Operator behaviour in these conditions can become quite coarse and I've sometimes heard basic Anglo-Saxon expletives, along with their modern German and Gallic equivalents being returned. Because I'm usually busy, I don't have time to join in many nets - but I often listen in as I work. Often they have many topics of interest in discussion (no doubt this topic will join the list!). However, even when provoked - I think it's not a good idea to discuss our nearest neighbour's problems (as we see them!) over the air. Perhaps a little diplomacy is needed on both sides at these times? Bad language is never a good idea - and even in the small hours on the 3.5MHz band. Someone will be listening - you can be sure of that! Higher Power? During my Christmas holiday operating I noticed one or two comments from non-M3 stations mentioning the relatively strong signals being received from some M3 operators. Sitting listening in my shack I started to think on the subject; are M3 operators enjoying getting the most out of their antennas to ensure the last drop of r.f. is radiated efficiently, or is higher power being used? Keen QRP operators ensure they get the most with 10W and often much less. Recently I worked a c.w. operator on 7MHz and he was using 500mW. Yet his signal was a good 599 with me! On the other hand my 10W was only earning a 579RST report. I wasn't unduly worried - the other station was using an excellent antenna system and I was using a relatively inefficient short wire with an autoantenna tuner (a.a.t.u.). Even though I have several reports of M3 Amateurs openly claiming on the air that they use higher power than their licence permits, and have had comments from readers - I'm left wondering: Is this possible breach of trust a common occurrence? The privilege of Amateur Radio operating needs trust and generally it is a trusting hobby. Only very occasionally do I hear of Radio Amateurs failing in this trust - whether it involves Licence conditions or something directly effecting fellow hobbyists. Perhaps you know more than I do? Is there a widespread problem? Personally I doubt it very much - but I would certainly like to learn of your own informed opinions and I look forward to hearing from you.
Rob, G3XFD
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
|
| Home
| For
Sale & Wanted | Tell
a friend | Guestbook
| Cast Your Vote | Newsboard
| Amateur Radio
Forum | Links | Diary
Dates | | Games | SWLs | 'How To' Guides | Humour | Data Comms | Lottery | Amateur TV | Contests | Can You Help? | Contact Us | 10 Metres | | Clubs Worldwide | Subscribe to our Newsletter | | |
|
| |